As someone who was brought up in St. Andrews and enjoyed the privileges of cheaper golf and having experienced previous decisions of those who make these things, it comes as no surprise that there is an attempt to rip off the local folk, and those like myself who have ordinary tickets, in the new pricing system arrived at because of the coming on stream of a new course.
I’ve not walked the Castle course, only seen an isolated picture or two (not wildly impressive) and to hear of a price hike of more than 30% for locals and a possible doubling of my kind of ticket, I cannot see the justification for such a rise…. unless it the making of a fast buck (sorry, pound) is at the back of it all. Massive profits have been made by an organisation whose original remit was not to be profit driven, have not, in my humble opinion, translated into the upkeep of the course to good standards. The annual cycle of playing with astroturf mats makes golfing there an unpleasant experience, and before any say that if it is so unpleasant then when am I still playing there, such comments betray an ignorance of the tradition, history and loyalty of playing at St. Andrews.
Course redesign in St. Andrews has, arguably, destroyed two of the courses there (Eden and Jubilee) from fun tests of golf to lengthy slogs with hazards that are very un-St. Andrews like (ponds for example). Little thought appears to have been given to the original layouts of greens and their current approaches (par three greens that offer little attack opportunities as par five greens, for instance) and the loss of perfectly good golf holes, some of which would ahv been described as holes that define the course. (The 17th on the Eden for example… the 2nd on the Jubilee) These redesigns went through with little if any consultation, and the current price hikes are of the same ilk.
There has been a little furore in the local press (Dundee Courier), but I am not holding my breath expecting a climb down by the price fixers. It would be nice to wrong….